Pinnacle Gazette

Piers Morgan Threatens Legal Action Against Earl Spencer Over Memoir Claims

The broadcaster disputes allegations made in Spencer's upcoming book about Princess Diana

Category: Arts & Culture

British commentator Piers Morgan has announced plans to sue Earl Spencer, the brother of Princess Diana, alongside the publisher Penguin Random House, over what he describes as "bulls..t" claims made in Spencer's forthcoming memoir, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister. The 384-page book is scheduled for international release on Tuesday.

In a statement shared on social media platform X, Morgan revealed he has instructed lawyers to pursue legal action, demanding the removal of passages he claims contain "demonstrable lies" about him. He stated, "I am taking legal action against Earl Spencer and his publishers over demonstrable lies he has written about me in his new book, which call into question his credibility as a supposed ‘historian’." Morgan promised to provide more details during his evening show, Piers Morgan Uncensored.

The controversy primarily revolves around Spencer's assertion that Morgan was involved in publishing intrusive photographs of Diana exercising at a gym in 1993. Morgan has vehemently denied this claim, stating he did not join the Daily Mirror until October 1995, nearly two years after the photos were published. At the time of the gym photos, Morgan was working for the Sun, a rival tabloid, which he emphasized during his program. "About as far removed from responsibility for the Mirror scoop as I could possibly have been," he remarked.

In addition to the disputed photographs, Spencer's memoir recounts his efforts to contact newspaper editors before Diana's funeral in 1997 to withdraw their invitations. He described Morgan as responding "surly" before hanging up, linking this reaction to the controversy surrounding the gym photos. Morgan countered, asserting that Spencer's account is filled with inaccuracies that undermine his credibility.

The background

The tension between Morgan and Spencer highlights the complex relationship between the media and the royal family, particularly in the aftermath of Diana's tragic death in 1997. Spencer has often positioned himself as a protector of his sister's legacy, frequently criticizing the media's role in her life and death. His memoir aims to shed light on their relationship, but it has also reignited discussions about the ethics of journalism and the responsibilities of public figures.

In the years since Diana's death, both Morgan and Spencer have become prominent figures in the media, each with their own distinct narratives. Morgan has faced criticism for his often controversial opinions and journalistic practices, particularly during his tenure at various tabloids. Conversely, Spencer has maintained a somewhat more reserved public image, often advocating for a more respectful portrayal of his sister's life.

As Spencer's memoir approaches its release, the media is abuzz with speculation about its contents and the potential ramifications for those involved. The book's publication comes at a time when public interest in the royal family remains high, especially with the recent developments surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who have both spoken candidly about their experiences with the press.

What's next

As the release date for Swan Song: Diana, My Sister nears, Morgan's legal threat adds a layer of intrigue to the memoir's debut. The outcome of this dispute could have broader implications for how memoirs are perceived in the media and the potential for legal challenges arising from personal narratives.

In his recent broadcast, Morgan reiterated his demand for the removal of the disputed passages from Spencer's book. He stated, "In the meantime, Earl Spencer, you’ll be hearing, and your publishers from my lawyers because I would like the complete lie that you’ve published about me and those photographs to be removed from your book. And I would like a donation to be made to the King’s Trust for the damage you’ve caused with your lie." This statement indicates that Morgan is seeking retraction and accountability for the alleged harm to his reputation.

The legal proceedings, if they occur, will likely draw considerable media attention, as both parties are well-known figures in the UK. The outcome could potentially affect Spencer's credibility as an author and historian, particularly if the court finds in favor of Morgan's claims. Meanwhile, the public will be eager to see how Spencer responds to these allegations in the days leading up to the book's release.

As of now, the literary world anticipates the impact of Spencer's memoir, which promises to provide a personal perspective on his sister's life, even as it faces scrutiny from Morgan's legal challenge. The book's publication on September 26, 2026, will undoubtedly be a focal point for discussions about media ethics and the portrayal of public figures in memoirs.